fast food: hurt body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt body 1.00
be bad for body 0.85
be bad for human body 0.81
make body fat 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fast food, hurt body)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, hurt body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, hurt body)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for body)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, make body fat)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, make body fat)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fast food, make body fat)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fast food, make body fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, hurt body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fast food, hurt body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(fast food, hurt body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)