fast food: be bad for human body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for human body 1.00
be bad for body 0.93
be bad for humans 0.83
make body fat 0.81
hurt body 0.81
be bad for health 0.79
be bad for environment 0.75
be good for health 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for body)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, hurt body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, hurt body)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, hurt body)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fast food, hurt body)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, make body fat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, make body fat)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fast food, make body fat)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fast food, make body fat)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)