fast food: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be bad for economy 0.82
be bad for health 0.80
has quality bad 0.80
be good for economy 0.80
be good for us 0.78
be bad for humans 0.78
be good for health 0.78
be unhealthy for us 0.78
be bad for children 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be unhealthy for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for children)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)