fast food: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
be unhealthy for us 0.83
has quality good 0.80
be bad for environment 0.78
be good for economy 0.78
be good for health 0.78
do more harm than good 0.77
be bad for children 0.76
be bad for humans 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fast food, do more harm than good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fast food, do more harm than good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for children)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fast food, do more harm than good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fast food, do more harm than good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)