junk food: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
be good 0.86
feel good 0.80
be good for us 0.80
be bad for health 0.77
CAN can good 0.75
have low value 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stuff, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bad food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bad food, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stuff, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad food, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(stuff, feel good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stuff, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bad food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(junk food, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, be good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(junk food, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(junk food, be good for us)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(junk food, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, CAN can good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, have low value)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(junk food, CAN can good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, have low value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(junk food, CAN can good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(junk food, have low value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have low value)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, CAN can good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bad food, is quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(stuff, feel good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bad food, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(stuff, feel good)