food: be good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.73
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good 1.00
be good for you 0.92
be cheap but not that good 0.82
be bad for your health 0.82
be bad for person to eat 0.81
be nice to eat 0.81
be delicious and good for your body 0.79
be tasty and healthy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be good for you)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be delicious and good for your body)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be tasty and healthy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fresh food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be good for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be good for you)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be tasty and healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be tasty and healthy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be delicious and good for your body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be delicious and good for your body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(food, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fresh food, be good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be good for you)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be delicious and good for your body)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be tasty and healthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)