fast food: be cheap but not that good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap but not that good 1.00
be used to cheap 0.89
be mean to be cheap food 0.88
has cheap food 0.86
be used to buy cheap food 0.86
be used to make good 0.84
be bad for you 0.83
be at cheap restaurant 0.83
be good 0.82
be bad for person to eat 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(industry, be used to make good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(industry, be used to make good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(industry, be used to make good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(industry, be used to make good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hot dog, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(industry, be used to make good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot dog, be good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for you)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(industry, be used to make good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)