fast food restaurant: be used to buy cheap food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66
, subway
Weight: 0.59
, diner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to buy cheap food 1.00
has cheap food 0.96
be used to cheap 0.94
be mean to be cheap food 0.93
be used to buy food 0.92
be at cheap restaurant 0.89
be used to sell food 0.87
be cheap but not that good 0.86
be used to buy meal 0.82
be sell in fast food restaurant 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to sell food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be sell in fast food restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(hamburger, be sell in fast food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be sell in fast food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to buy food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to sell food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be sell in fast food restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to sell food)