fast food: be used to cheap

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to cheap 1.00
be used to buy cheap food 0.94
has cheap food 0.93
be mean to be cheap food 0.90
be cheap but not that good 0.89
be at cheap restaurant 0.89
be expensive 0.78
be used to buy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to buy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(meat, be expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(meat, be used to buy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to buy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be used to buy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)