meat: be expensive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, pork
Weight: 0.68
, tofu
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive 1.00
be expensive to purchase 0.91
be used to cheap 0.78
cost money 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(food, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(item, be expensive to purchase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(item, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(item, be expensive to purchase)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(item, cost money)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(food, cost money)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(item, be expensive to purchase)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food, cost money)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(item, cost money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(item, be expensive to purchase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(meat, be expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(meat, be expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(food, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(meat, be expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(item, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(meat, be expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(meat, be expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, be expensive to purchase)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food, cost money)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, cost money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, be expensive to purchase)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food, cost money)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(meat, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, cost money)