fast food restaurant: has cheap food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66
, subway
Weight: 0.59
, diner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has cheap food 1.00
be used to buy cheap food 0.96
be mean to be cheap food 0.94
be used to cheap 0.93
be at cheap restaurant 0.90
be cheap but not that good 0.86
be used to buy food 0.85
has food 0.83
be used to eat fast food 0.80
be used to sell food 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to sell food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(restaurant, be used to sell food)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to buy food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to sell food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to sell food)