hot dog: be bad for you

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, soft drink
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for you 1.00
be bad for person to eat 0.91
be bad for your health 0.91
be good 0.87
be cheap but not that good 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for you)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(hot dog, be bad for you)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot dog, be good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hot dog, be good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for you)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)