fast food: be bad for your health

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for your health 1.00
be bad for you 0.91
be bad for person to eat 0.86
be important to health 0.82
be good 0.82
be used to make good 0.79
be cheap but not that good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(industry, be used to make good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(industry, be used to make good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(industry, be used to make good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(industry, be used to make good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hot dog, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for you)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for your health)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheap but not that good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheap but not that good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(industry, be used to make good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for you)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot dog, be good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(industry, be used to make good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fast food, be bad for your health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)