junk food: be bad for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for health 1.00
affect health 0.88
be bad for people 0.83
has quality bad 0.81
be good 0.79
be bad for body 0.78
has quality good 0.77
be unhealthy for us 0.77
be bad in schools 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad food, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for health)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, affect health)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect health)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(junk food, affect health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for body)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, be good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect health)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)