junk food: be bad for body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for body 1.00
affect body 0.86
affect human body 0.83
be bad for people 0.82
affect bodies 0.80
affect human bodies 0.80
be bad for health 0.78
be good 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for body)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, affect body)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(junk food, affect human body)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(junk food, affect human bodies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(junk food, affect bodies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect human body)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect bodies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, affect body)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(junk food, affect human body)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, affect human bodies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(junk food, affect bodies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for health)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for people)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect body)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect human body)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, be good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect bodies)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)