junk food: be bad for people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for people 1.00
be good for us 0.84
be bad for health 0.83
be good 0.83
be bad for body 0.82
affect people 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
be unhealthy for us 0.80
be bad in schools 0.79
feel good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stuff, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stuff, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(stuff, feel good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stuff, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for people)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(junk food, affect people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(junk food, affect people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for health)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(junk food, be good for us)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, be good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(junk food, feel good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(junk food, feel good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect people)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(stuff, feel good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(stuff, feel good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(junk food, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)