junk food: be bad in schools

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in schools 1.00
be good in schools 0.98
be in school 0.86
be banned for schools 0.86
be bad for people 0.79
benefit school 0.77
be bad for health 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good in schools)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good in schools)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(junk food, be good in schools)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(junk food, be in school)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(junk food, be in school)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be in school)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(junk food, be good in schools)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(junk food, be in school)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be banned for schools)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(junk food, be banned for schools)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(junk food, benefit school)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(junk food, be banned for schools)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(junk food, benefit school)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(junk food, be banned for schools)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(junk food, benefit school)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(junk food, benefit school)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for health)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)