junk food: be banned for schools

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned for schools 1.00
be good in schools 0.86
be bad in schools 0.86
be in school 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(junk food, be banned for schools)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good in schools)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(junk food, be good in schools)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good in schools)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(junk food, be good in schools)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(junk food, be in school)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(junk food, be in school)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be in school)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad in schools)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(junk food, be in school)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad in schools)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be banned for schools)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(junk food, be banned for schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(junk food, be banned for schools)