junk food: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
be good 0.82
be bad for health 0.81
be bad for people 0.80
be bad for body 0.76
feel good 0.76
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stuff, feel good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bad food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bad food, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stuff, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad food, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(stuff, feel good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stuff, feel good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bad food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(junk food, is quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, be good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for body)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(junk food, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(junk food, be good for us)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(junk food, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bad food, is quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(stuff, feel good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bad food, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(stuff, feel good)