fast food: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
is low quality 0.82
be bad for health 0.81
be bad for environment 0.80
be good for health 0.77
be bad for body 0.76
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chinese food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(fast food, is low quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is low quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fast food, is low quality)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, is low quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fast food, is quality)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinese food, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)