pizza: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.68
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.68
, frozen food
Weight: 0.66
, junk food
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.37
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, burrito
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.36
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
be good 0.86
is good for 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
is low quality 0.84
be good for health 0.80
feel good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(fast food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(junk food, feel good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fast food, is low quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fast food, is low quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(junk food, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is low quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, feel good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burrito, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(fast food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(junk food, feel good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fast food, is low quality)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(burrito, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(burrito, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taco bell, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(taco bell, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cheeseburger, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cheeseburger, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(taco bell, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(taco bell, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cheeseburger, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pizza, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, is low quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(hamburger, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(burrito, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hamburger, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(taco bell, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(taco bell, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, is low quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)