fast food: be good for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for health 1.00
be bad for health 0.97
be considered for health 0.91
has quality good 0.80
be good for economy 0.79
be good for us 0.78
be bad for environment 0.78
has quality bad 0.77
is healthy 0.77
be bad for children 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(junk food, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(junk food, is healthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is healthy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(taco, is healthy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(junk food, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(taco, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(taco, is healthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fast food, be considered for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fast food, be considered for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for children)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(fast food, is healthy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is healthy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for us)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is healthy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, is healthy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(junk food, is healthy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(taco, is healthy)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(junk food, is healthy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fast food, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)