fast food: be considered for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered for health 1.00
be good for health 0.91
be bad for health 0.89
be considered unhealthy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered for health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be considered unhealthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be considered unhealthy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fast food, be considered for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chinese food, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chinese food, be considered unhealthy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pizza, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pizza, be considered unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fast food, be considered for health)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chinese food, be considered unhealthy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pizza, be considered unhealthy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fast food, be considered for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)