junk food: affect human bodies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect human bodies 1.00
affect bodies 0.95
affect human body 0.93
affect body 0.86
be bad for body 0.80
affect people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, affect human bodies)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(junk food, affect bodies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect bodies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(junk food, affect human body)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect human body)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, affect body)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect body)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect bodies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect human body)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(junk food, affect bodies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(junk food, affect human body)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(junk food, affect people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, affect body)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for body)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(junk food, affect people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(junk food, affect people)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(junk food, affect human bodies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, affect human bodies)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)