noodle: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, chinese food
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings ramen
Weight: 0.42
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, soup
Weight: 0.34
, pretzel
Weight: 0.34
, potato chip
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for health 0.81
taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(soup, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pretzel, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pretzel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(noodle, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(noodle, be bad for health)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(noodle, be bad for health)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(noodle, be bad for health)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(noodle, taste good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(noodle, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(noodle, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pretzel, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)