potato chip: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chip
Weight: 0.73
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, food
Weight: 0.71
, product
Weight: 0.68
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.36
, fried egg
Weight: 0.36
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
be bad for us 0.80
taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fried egg, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(potato chip, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality wrong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(potato chip, has quality wrong)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(potato chip, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(potato chip, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)