potato chip: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chip
Weight: 0.73
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, food
Weight: 0.71
, product
Weight: 0.68
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.36
, fried egg
Weight: 0.36
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste different 0.93
be different taste 0.93
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chip, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chip, taste different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(food, taste different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chip, taste different)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, taste different)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chip, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fried egg, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(potato chip, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(potato chip, taste different)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(potato chip, be different taste)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(potato chip, be different taste)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste different)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be different taste)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(potato chip, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be different taste)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chip, taste different)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chip, taste different)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)