potato chip: taste different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chip
Weight: 0.73
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, food
Weight: 0.71
, product
Weight: 0.68
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.36
, fried egg
Weight: 0.36
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste different 1.00
be different taste 1.00
taste good 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste different)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste different)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chip, taste different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(food, taste different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chip, taste different)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, taste different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(potato chip, taste different)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(potato chip, be different taste)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be different taste)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(potato chip, be different taste)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(potato chip, taste good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be different taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chip, taste different)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chip, taste different)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(potato chip, taste different)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)