noodle: be bad for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, chinese food
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings ramen
Weight: 0.42
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, soup
Weight: 0.34
, pretzel
Weight: 0.34
, potato chip
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for health 1.00
be hazard to health 0.81
has quality bad 0.81
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(noodle, be bad for health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(noodle, be bad for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(soup, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pretzel, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pretzel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(noodle, be bad for health)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(noodle, be hazard to health)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(noodle, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(noodle, be hazard to health)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(noodle, be hazard to health)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be hazard to health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(noodle, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(noodle, be bad for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pretzel, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)