noodle: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, chinese food
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings ramen
Weight: 0.42
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, soup
Weight: 0.34
, pretzel
Weight: 0.34
, potato chip
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste different 0.93
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(noodle, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(potato chip, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(potato chip, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(potato chip, taste different)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(soup, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pretzel, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pretzel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(noodle, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(noodle, taste different)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(noodle, taste different)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(noodle, taste different)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(noodle, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(noodle, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, taste good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pretzel, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pretzel, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)