chip: be called chip in beauty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called chip in beauty 1.00
be called chip 0.89
have chip 0.88
be in beauty 0.82
be from beauty 0.82
was from beauty 0.81
be called programmed chip 0.81
be called chips 0.80
has quality chips 0.79
be other chips 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be other chips)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, be called chip)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, be called programmed chip)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be called chips)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(microprocessor, be called chip) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, be called chip)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(microprocessor, be called programmed chip) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, be called programmed chip)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(potato chip, be called chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be called chips)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(potato chip, be other chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be other chips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chip, be called chip in beauty)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chip, have chip)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chip, have chip)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chip, be called chips)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in beauty)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(chip, have chip)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(chip, be in beauty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chip, be from beauty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chip, was from beauty)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chip, be called chips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have chip)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(chip, be called chips)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chip, be from beauty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chips)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chip, was from beauty)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chip, be in beauty)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chip, be in beauty)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chip, be from beauty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chip, be from beauty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chip, was from beauty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(chip, was from beauty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chip, be called chip in beauty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(microprocessor, be called chip)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(potato chip, be called chips)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(microprocessor, be called programmed chip)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(potato chip, be other chips)