chip: be mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be mammals 1.00
be used on animals 0.76
be bad for humans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(product, be used on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chip, be mammals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chip, be mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(product, be used on animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(product, be used on animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(product, be used on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chip, be mammals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chip, be mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(chip, be mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chip, be mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chip, be mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(product, be used on animals)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(product, be used on animals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(chip, be mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)