chip: have air

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have air 1.00
have air in them 0.91
have filled with air packets 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, have air)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(potato chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(potato chip, have air)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(chip, have air)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chip, have air in them)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chip, have air in them)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chip, have filled with air packets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chip, have filled with air packets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chip, have filled with air packets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(chip, have air in them)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chip, have filled with air packets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chip, have air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(potato chip, have air)