chip: have air in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have air in them 1.00
have air 0.91
have milk in them 0.79
be good for us 0.77
be bad for us 0.77
be unhealthy for us 0.76
have filled with air packets 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chip, have air in them)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chip, have air in them)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, have air)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chip, have air in them)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chip, have air in them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(potato chip, have air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(potato chip, have air)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(chip, have air in them)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chip, have air)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(chip, have milk in them)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chip, have air)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(chip, have milk in them)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(chip, have milk in them)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chip, have filled with air packets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(chip, have air)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chip, have filled with air packets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chip, have filled with air packets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chip, have milk in them)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chip, have filled with air packets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chip, have air in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(potato chip, have air)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(chip, have air in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)