chiropractic: is healthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents modality
Weight: 0.64
, method
Weight: 0.60
, field
Weight: 0.59
, health
Weight: 0.57
Siblings acupuncture
Weight: 0.35
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.34
, reflexology
Weight: 0.34
, massage
Weight: 0.34
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is healthy 1.00
be good for health 0.77
is stable 0.76
is more stable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(method, is stable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chiropractic, is healthy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chiropractic, is healthy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, is more stable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(method, is stable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is more stable)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is stable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(massage, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(massage, is healthy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(method, is stable)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, is healthy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, is healthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(massage, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(massage, is healthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(massage, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(massage, be good for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(chiropractic, is healthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chiropractic, is healthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(method, is more stable)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(method, is stable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(massage, be good for health)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(massage, is healthy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(method, is more stable)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chiropractic, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(method, is stable)