method: is more stable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more stable 1.00
is stable 0.97
is more efficient 0.76
be better than one 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(extraction, be better than one)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(extraction, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(method, is more stable)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(method, is stable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(method, is stable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(method, is stable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is stable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is more stable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(method, is more stable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(extraction, is more efficient)