extraction: be better than one

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, operation
Weight: 0.66
, process
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, harvesting
Weight: 0.34
, distillation
Weight: 0.34
, combustion
Weight: 0.34
, diffusion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than one 1.00
has quality better 0.83
be good way separate 0.77
is more efficient 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(distillation, be good way separate)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(distillation, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(distillation, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(distillation, is more efficient)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(distillation, be good way separate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(distillation, be good way separate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(extraction, be better than one)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be good way separate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(extraction, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(extraction, be good way separate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(extraction, is more efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(extraction, be good way separate)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(extraction, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(extraction, is more efficient)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(extraction, be good way separate)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(extraction, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(extraction, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(distillation, be good way separate)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(distillation, is more efficient)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)