extraction: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, operation
Weight: 0.66
, process
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, harvesting
Weight: 0.34
, distillation
Weight: 0.34
, combustion
Weight: 0.34
, diffusion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
be better than one 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distillation, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(extraction, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(extraction, be better than one)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(extraction, be better than one)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(extraction, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)