chocolate bar: have legs in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chocolate
Weight: 0.80
, sweet
Weight: 0.72
, junk food
Weight: 0.68
, bar
Weight: 0.66
Siblings wrapper
Weight: 0.53
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.40
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.40
, candy bar
Weight: 0.40
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have legs in them 1.00
have scars on back 0.76
be good for us 0.76
give stomach ache 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(sweet, have scars on back)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet, give stomach ache)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(sweet, have scars on back)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(sweet, give stomach ache)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet, have scars on back)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(sweet, give stomach ache)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, give stomach ache)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(sweet, have scars on back)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet, give stomach ache)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chocolate milk, give stomach ache)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, give stomach ache)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(chocolate bar, have legs in them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(sweet, give stomach ache)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sweet, have scars on back)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, give stomach ache)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(sweet, give stomach ache)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sweet, have scars on back)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(chocolate bar, have legs in them)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)