chocolate: be classified as junk food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.72
, dessert
Weight: 0.68
, indulgence
Weight: 0.66
, ice cream
Weight: 0.64
, snack
Weight: 0.64
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.74
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, truffle
Weight: 0.54
, fudge
Weight: 0.47
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as junk food 1.00
be classified 0.80
be considered food 0.80
is food 0.78
is is food 0.77
is high risk food 0.77
be good in food 0.77
is risk food 0.77
be worst food eat 0.75
make food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dairy product, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(dairy product, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be worst food eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be worst food eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is risk food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is high risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be worst food eat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is high risk food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(truffle, be classified)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(truffle, be considered food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(truffle, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dairy product, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(dairy product, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be worst food eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(truffle, be considered food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(truffle, be considered food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(truffle, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(truffle, is food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(truffle, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(truffle, be classified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chocolate, be classified as junk food)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chocolate, is food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chocolate, make food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chocolate, is food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(chocolate, make food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate, be good in food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(chocolate, is food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(chocolate, make food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be good in food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chocolate, be good in food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, make food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dairy product, is risk food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ice cream, be worst food eat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dairy product, is high risk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(truffle, is food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(truffle, be considered food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(truffle, be classified)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dairy product, is risk food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ice cream, be worst food eat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chocolate, be classified as junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dairy product, is high risk food)