cicada: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.47
, animal
Weight: 0.44
, bug
Weight: 0.42
, bird
Weight: 0.41
Siblings mosquito bite
Weight: 0.35
, ladybug
Weight: 0.35
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.35
, aphid
Weight: 0.35
, mosquito
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
is early year 0.83
have 17 year cycle 0.80
be loud year 2017 0.76
be loud year 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be bad year)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(aphid, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aphid, be bad year)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mosquito bite, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mosquito bite, be bad year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cicada, be bad year)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cicada, have 17 year cycle)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cicada, have 17 year cycle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cicada, be loud year 2017)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cicada, be loud year)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cicada, have 17 year cycle)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cicada, have 17 year cycle)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cicada, be loud year 2017)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cicada, be loud year)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be loud year 2017)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be loud year)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cicada, be loud year 2017)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cicada, be loud year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cicada, be bad year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(aphid, be bad year)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mosquito bite, be bad year)