circle: has quality function

Related concepts

Parents	form Weight: 0.63 , figure Weight: 0.61 , time Weight: 0.60 , group Weight: 0.59
Siblings	family Weight: 0.62 , triangle Weight: 0.32 , time zone Weight: 0.32 , functional group Weight: 0.31 , oval Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality function	1.00
has quality functions	0.91
has quality good	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(circle, has quality function)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(circle, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(time zone, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(circle, has quality function)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(circle, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(time zone, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(time zone, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(circle, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(circle, has quality functions)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality functions)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(circle, has quality functions)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(circle, has quality functions)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(circle, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(circle, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(circle, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(circle, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(time zone, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(circle, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)