group: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents terrorist organization
Weight: 0.75
, organization
Weight: 0.64
, third party
Weight: 0.61
, way
Weight: 0.61
Siblings functional group
Weight: 0.77
, committee
Weight: 0.69
, caravan
Weight: 0.67
, choir
Weight: 0.67
, led zeppelin
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality definition 0.76
be better time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(way, be better time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(terrorist organization, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(terrorist organization, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(terrorist organization, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(terrorist organization, has quality definition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(way, be better time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(terrorist organization, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(terrorist organization, has quality definition)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(way, be better time)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(caravan, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(committee, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(terrorist organization, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(way, be better time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(terrorist organization, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(committee, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(committee, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(choir, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(caravan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(caravan, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(group, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(terrorist organization, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(terrorist organization, has quality definition)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(way, be better time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(committee, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(choir, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(caravan, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(terrorist organization, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(terrorist organization, has quality definition)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(way, be better time)