choir: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.67
, singing
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, program
Weight: 0.57
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.56
Siblings percussion instrument
Weight: 0.35
, cello
Weight: 0.35
, congregation
Weight: 0.35
, clarinet
Weight: 0.34
, orchestra
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
sound good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(choir, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(choir, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(choir, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(singing, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(choir, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(choir, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(choir, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(choir, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(choir, sound good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(choir, sound good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(choir, sound good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(choir, sound good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(choir, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(singing, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(singing, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)