singing: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents act
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, song
Weight: 0.58
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.57
Siblings choir
Weight: 0.62
, love song
Weight: 0.37
, sing
Weight: 0.36
, dancing
Weight: 0.35
, acoustic guitar
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is bad quality 0.93
is quality 0.91
feel good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(singing, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(singing, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dancing, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(love song, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(singing, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(singing, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(love song, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(love song, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(choir, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sing, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(dancing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(dancing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(singing, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(singing, is bad quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(singing, is bad quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(singing, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(singing, is bad quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(singing, is quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(singing, is quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(singing, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(singing, is quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(singing, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(singing, feel good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(singing, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(singing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(love song, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(choir, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dancing, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)