singing: is bad quality

Related concepts

Parents	act Weight: 0.61 , thing Weight: 0.59 , song Weight: 0.58 , musical instrument Weight: 0.57
Siblings	choir Weight: 0.62 , love song Weight: 0.37 , sing Weight: 0.36 , dancing Weight: 0.35 , acoustic guitar Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is bad quality	1.00
has quality good	0.93
is quality	0.89
feel good	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(singing, is bad quality)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(singing, is bad quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sing, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(choir, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(love song, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(dancing, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(singing, is bad quality)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(singing, is bad quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(love song, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(love song, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(choir, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(choir, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(sing, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(sing, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(dancing, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(dancing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(singing, is bad quality)

Similarity expansion

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(singing, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(singing, is quality)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(singing, feel good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(singing, feel good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(singing, has quality good)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(singing, is bad quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(act, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(love song, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(choir, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(sing, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(dancing, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(act, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(singing, is bad quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)