circulatory system: be better than single

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.72
, human body
Weight: 0.59
, artery
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, organism
Weight: 0.56
Siblings aorta
Weight: 0.56
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.38
, digestive system
Weight: 0.38
, immune system
Weight: 0.37
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than single 1.00
be better than open 0.83
is more efficient 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(digestive system, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(circulatory system, be better than single)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(circulatory system, be better than open)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(circulatory system, be better than open)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, be better than open)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(circulatory system, is more efficient)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, be better than open)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, is more efficient)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(circulatory system, is more efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, be better than single)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(circulatory system, be better than single)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, be better than single) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(digestive system, is more efficient)