city: be dominate by large build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dominate by large build 1.00
has large build 0.85
has build 0.77
be full of build 0.77
has many tall build 0.76
allow build 0.76
has tall build close together 0.76
be defined as large city in unite state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has many tall build)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, has many tall build)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new york city, has many tall build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(city, be dominate by large build)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(city, has large build)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(city, has many tall build)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(city, has tall build close together)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(city, be full of build)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(city, has large build)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(city, allow build)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(city, has build)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(city, allow build)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(city, has large build)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(city, be full of build)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, has build)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(city, be full of build)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(city, allow build)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(city, has tall build close together)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(city, has build)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(city, allow build)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(city, has tall build close together)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(city, has many tall build)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(city, has many tall build)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(city, be full of build)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(city, has tall build close together)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(city, has large build)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(city, has many tall build)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(city, has build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(city, be dominate by large build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(new york city, has many tall build)