city: has large build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has large build 1.00
has build 0.91
be dominate by large build 0.85
has many tall build 0.84
has tall build 0.83
be build by person 0.83
be full of build 0.82
has tall build close together 0.82
has many person build and car 0.81
allow build 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has many tall build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, has many tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new york city, has many tall build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(city, has large build)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(city, has many tall build)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, has build)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(city, has tall build)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(city, has build)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, be dominate by large build)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(city, has large build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(city, has large build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(city, has large build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(new york city, has many tall build)