city: has tall build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has tall build 1.00
has many tall build 0.97
has tall build close together 0.92
has build 0.85
has large build 0.83
be build by person 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has many tall build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, has many tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new york city, has many tall build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(city, has tall build)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(city, has many tall build)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(city, has tall build close together)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(city, has many tall build)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(city, has many tall build)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(city, has tall build close together)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(city, has build)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(city, has tall build close together)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(city, be build by person)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(city, has large build)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(city, has many tall build)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(city, has build)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(city, has build)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(city, has tall build close together)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(city, has large build)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(city, has large build)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(city, be build by person)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(city, has large build)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(city, be build by person)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(city, be build by person)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(city, has build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, has tall build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(city, has tall build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, has tall build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(new york city, has many tall build)